Hungary's Victory Is Real. And So Are the Lessons Trump Will Draw Before the Midterms.
THE FALL Part 3: The SAVE Act, ICE, and the difference between Orbán's playbook and Trump's.
I was putting the finishing touches on yesterday’s newsletter — Part 2 of this series, about Portugal 1974 — when my phone lit up. A WhatsApp message. Twenty seconds later, another.
Orbán was out.
I sat there for a moment. Then I went back to the keyboard and rewrote the opening and closing of a newsletter that was 99% finished. While I was writing a series called The Fall, a real fall was taking place. I published it within the hour, with a smile I could not quite hide.
That piece went out with Portugal at its center and Hungary at its edges — a live backdrop I had not planned for. The response from readers through the night was extraordinary. The word that appeared most in the comments was hope. Not relief. Not satisfaction. Hope. Americans writing from across the country, drawing a line from Budapest to Washington and asking what comes next.
This is what comes next. Part 3 is the piece I promised: how Orbán built it, why it fell, and what the wreckage tells us about the model that Trump and his circle spent years admiring and borrowing from.
What Orbán built
To understand why last night matters beyond Budapest, you need to understand what Orbán actually constructed over 16 years. Not the caricature. The system.
He came back to power in 2010 with a two-thirds parliamentary majority — enough to rewrite the constitution, which he did. He then used that rewritten constitution to reshape the judiciary, the electoral system, and the media. Each change was individually defensible. Cumulatively, they produced something new: a European Union member state that Freedom House classified as only “partly free.”
The judiciary first. Orbán packed the constitutional court with loyalists, lowered the mandatory retirement age for judges to push out those already serving, and created new oversight bodies staffed by Fidesz appointees. By the end, the courts were not independent. They were managed.
The media next. Independent outlets were bought up by oligarchs close to the government and folded into a single pro-government media conglomerate. State advertising was redirected to friendly outlets and withdrawn from critical ones. The few remaining independent voices operated under constant legal and financial pressure. When the last major independent radio station lost its license in 2020, hundreds of journalists marched in silence through Budapest.
The electoral system last, and most carefully. Constituency boundaries were redrawn to favor Fidesz strongholds. Voting rules for ethnic Hungarians abroad — a reliable Fidesz constituency — were made easier. The threshold for opposition parties to enter parliament was raised. Fidesz did not need to win a majority of votes to win a majority of seats. The system was calibrated to make that unnecessary.
American readers will recognize the pattern. The sequence is not identical to what is happening in Washington. But the direction — courts, media, electoral rules, all adjusted toward the same destination — is not unfamiliar.
The European Council on Foreign Relations, in an analysis published before the election, called it plainly: the “Orbánisation of America.” Republicans studied Budapest. They visited, they took notes, they adapted. Steve Bannon was among the first. He was not the last.
The international network
Orbán did not build this alone, and he did not keep it to himself.
He became, over the past decade, the connective tissue of a global authoritarian network. Trump. Putin. Bolsonaro. Meloni. Le Pen. The relationships were not incidental. They were strategic. Budapest hosted CPAC — the American conservative conference — as an annual event. Tucker Carlson broadcast from there. Orbán addressed the gathering and was treated as a prophet.
The relationship with Trump ran deepest. Orbán backed Trump in 2016 when backing Trump was still a gamble. Trump called them both “black sheep.” When Biden won in 2020, Orbán stayed close to Mar-a-Lago and waited. When Trump returned in 2024, Orbán was among the first international leaders at the table.
The relationship with Moscow was different in character but equally consequential. Orbán maintained energy dependency on Russian gas long after the invasion of Ukraine made that dependency a political liability across Europe. He blocked EU sanctions packages. He vetoed Ukraine aid. His government shared information from sensitive EU meetings with Russian intelligence — a revelation that shocked even those who had low expectations of Budapest’s loyalty to the alliance.
Project 2025 — the blueprint prepared by the Heritage Foundation for Trump’s second term — drew explicitly on the Hungarian model. Capture the administrative state. Replace civil servants with loyalists. Control the information environment. Use the power of incumbency to make the next election harder to lose. The Hungarian proof of concept was the point. It showed that it could be done inside a democracy, with elections still happening, without the crude violence of a traditional coup.
How he fell
Apply the five triggers from Part 1 of this series and Hungary 2026 tells a clean story.
The economic crisis was the foundation of Magyar’s campaign. Hungary had experienced three years of stagnation. Inflation had eaten into living standards. The country had become one of the poorest in the European Union — a remarkable deterioration for a state that had grown steadily through the 2010s. The Orbán bargain — accept the erosion of your rights and we will deliver prosperity — stopped working when the prosperity stopped.
Elite fracture arrived in the form of Magyar himself. He was not an outsider. He had spent more than two decades inside Fidesz, working for the government and state enterprises. His ex-wife was a minister. He knew the system from the inside, which is precisely what made him credible when he turned against it. A corruption scandal in early 2024 involving a presidential pardon in a child abuse case gave him his opening. He took it.
Mass mobilization was sustained and geographic. Magyar spent two years traveling Hungary almost without pause — six stops a day in the final weeks, focusing deliberately on provincial towns and villages where Fidesz had always been strongest. He was not preaching to the converted in Budapest. He was going where the votes were buried.
International pressure cut both ways. The European Union had frozen roughly 17 billion euros in funds for Hungary over rule-of-law concerns. That hurt the government and deprived it of the money it needed. Brussels did not topple Orbán. But Brussels made him more expensive to support.
And then there was Vance.
JD Vance flew to Budapest on April 7, five days before the vote, stood on stage with Orbán, and told Hungarians that Trump was watching. It did not help. By multiple accounts it actively hurt. Voters already tired of Orbán’s closeness with Washington’s hard right did not need an American vice president arriving to remind them of it. The foreign endorsement did not protect the incumbent. Record turnout delivered a popular vote margin of around 13 points. The system Orbán built to make losing nearly impossible was not built for a gap that size.
Why Magyar won and what we don’t yet know
Many Hungarians voted against Orbán rather than for Magyar. That distinction matters and my readers are right to hold it.
Magyar is a center-right politician. He is opposed to illegal migration. On LGBT rights, he has been deliberately silent — neither hostile nor supportive, avoiding the topic entirely as a strategic choice in a country where Orbán weaponized it for years. He is, by the accounts of those who have worked with him, not an easy man internally — reportedly the only person in his party who speaks to the press, tolerating neither dissent nor shared authority. Whether that reflects necessary discipline in a party built in two years, or a disposition toward concentrated personal power, we do not yet know.
The challenges ahead are enormous. Orbán spent 16 years filling every significant institution — courts, universities, the state audit commission, the electoral commission, the media regulator — with loyalists. Those people do not leave because an election changed the government. Magyar has a parliamentary supermajority, which gives him the constitutional tools to reform. Whether he uses them to restore genuinely independent institutions or to replace Orbán’s people with his own will determine everything.
The economy is in difficulty. The relationship with Russia on energy will be complicated to unwind. The frozen EU funds require Budapest to meet rule-of-law conditions that will take years to satisfy. The Ukraine policy is uncertain.
We are right to celebrate. But we should also be cautious about what comes next. As one of my readers noted in the comments, thinking of Iran 1979: revolutions remove what was there before. They do not automatically install what should come next.
One warning we should not skip
There is a conclusion being drawn in Washington today that is the opposite of the one my readers are drawing.
Orbán built the most sophisticated electoral protection system in the democratic world — redrawn boundaries, captured courts, state media, clientelism reaching deep into rural communities — and it still was not enough. The margin was too large to hold. Voters removed him anyway.
If you are watching from the White House, that is not a reassuring story. It is a warning about the limits of institutional capture alone.
Hungary under Orbán did not deploy anything resembling what ICE is doing in American cities today. There were no dawn raids on immigrant communities. No videos of people being taken from homes and workplaces are circulating on social media. No deliberate campaign of public visibility aimed at making entire communities afraid to appear in public, let alone at a polling station. Orbán’s repression was institutional and bureaucratic. It was real and damaging. But it operated differently.
The expansion of ICE — its budget, its personnel, its methods, its deliberate visibility — may not be primarily about immigration enforcement. A recent Brookings analysis finds that intensified ICE operations produce a direct chilling effect on civic engagement, with eligible voters withdrawing from public life because of fear. Local reporting on operations in Minneapolis and elsewhere describes communities polarized between those mobilized in opposition and those too afraid to participate at all. The net effect on turnout in affected neighborhoods is suppression.
Then there is the SAVE America Act. It passed the House in February on a near party-line vote of 218 to 213. It is currently stalled in the Senate, blocked by the filibuster threshold. But it is not dead, and Trump has made clear he considers it central to his 2026 strategy. A federal court already blocked his earlier executive order attempt to impose the same proof-of-citizenship requirement by decree, which tells you both that the legal fight is coming and that the administration will keep pushing by whatever route is available. The Brennan Center estimates more than 21 million voting-age citizens lack ready access to the required documents — disproportionately young, low-income, and voters of color.
Trump has said openly that if the bill became law, Republicans would “never lose a race for 50 years.” That is not a critic’s characterization. It is the stated goal.
Orbán tilted the playing field through institutional design. The field held until the economic pain became severe enough that voters crossed it in overwhelming numbers. The lesson a watching authoritarian draws from Budapest is not “perhaps I should moderate.” It is: make sure the margin never gets that large. Suppress the vote before it is cast.
I am not stating this as an established fact about intent. I am stating it as the most urgent question to hold alongside the celebrations in Budapest. History is instructing in two directions at once tonight — toward hope on the banks of the Danube, and toward something requiring clear eyes in Washington.
What this means for Trump’s America
The model failed its most important test. That is the sentence that matters this morning in Washington, even if no one there will say it.
Orbán built the proof of concept. He showed that a leader could dismantle democratic institutions from within, maintain the form of elections while draining their content, and stay in power indefinitely. Last night, the voters of Hungary ran the experiment to its conclusion. The economic stagnation that Orbán’s system eventually produced — the corruption, the captured institutions that served a narrow elite rather than the public, the international isolation that cost Hungary billions — created the conditions for his removal. The system ate itself.
This does not mean the same trajectory is inevitable in the United States. America’s situation is different in ways that cut in both directions — some institutions are more resilient, some forms of pressure more aggressive. Steven Levitsky, co-author of How Democracies Die, said this week that in some respects, Trump has already been more oppressive than Orbán ever was. That is worth sitting with.
But the MAGA strategists who studied Budapest will be studying it again today. The blueprint failed its architect. The question now is what they conclude from that — and what Americans conclude first.
Part 4 will examine the Philippines 1986 — the original People Power revolution, the model that inspired every peaceful mass uprising since, and what it teaches about the role of the crowd.
Stay inspired,
Alexander
I am an independent journalist based in Europe, and I write about democracy, nature, and the intersection of politics and society. The Planet 🌎 is a reader-supported publication for those concerned about democratic backsliding and environmental collapse. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
A new newsletter:
The Curious Wanderer: Travel writing, trail photography, and more personal updates from wherever I happen to be. This one is not like my regular newsletters; here you’ll find articles I used to publish only for my small, supportive community on Patreon. Publishing will be irregular. Sometimes daily, when I am traveling. Sometimes quiet for weeks when I am not, and focus on the other newsletters. It’s the most personal of all my channels.
Join today:
Yesterday, I published part 4:
More from Alexander Verbeek:
Daybreak Notes & Beans: Every morning before dawn, I search for the best news you didn’t see. Science breakthroughs, conservation wins, human kindness, and beauty — delivered in time for your first coffee. Published most days of the week, positive, and unapologetically hopeful.
More: My digital notebook. Follow-ups to stories I didn’t have space to finish, reader questions answered properly, personal moments, and things that don’t fit anywhere else. No fixed format. Published when there’s something worth your time.
Screen Skills: A tech-newsletter for non-tech people. Short, practical digital literacy guides for people who want to use their devices with more confidence. No jargon, no condescension. Usually, I publish it every other working day.
Or perhaps you enjoyed the newsletter and would like to support my writing by buying me a coffee?
Notes and further reading:
On what Orbán built and the American connection: European Council on Foreign Relations, “The Orbánisation of America: Hungary’s lessons for Donald Trump” (October 2024). https://ecfr.eu/publication/the-orbanisation-of-america-hungarys-lessons-for-donald-trump/
John Kampfner, “Viktor Orbán Is Going Down Swinging,” Foreign Policy, March 5, 2026. https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/03/05/hungary-orban-election-magyar-campaign/
On the election result: “Election loss for Hungary’s Orbán has ripple effects for Trump,” Associated Press, April 13, 2026. https://abcnews.com/US/wireStory/election-loss-hungarian-prime-minister-orbn-ripple-effects-131982673
“5 Hard Truths for Donald Trump in Orbán’s Big Loss,” Newsweek, April 13, 2026. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-orban-hungary-election-eu-nato-magyar-11818647
On ICE and civic participation: Brookings Institution, “Eroding the American Dream Through Federal Policy Shifts” (2026). https://www.brookings.edu/articles/eroding-the-american-dream-through-federal-policy-shifts/
Social Workers brief, “Immigration Policy and Election Interference: Converging Threats to the 2026 Midterm Elections.” https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Briefs/Immigration-Policy-and-Election-Interference-Converging-Threats-to-the-2026-Midterm-Elections
On the SAVE America Act: Brennan Center for Justice, “New SAVE Act Bills Would Still Block Millions of Americans from Voting.” https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-save-act-bills-would-still-block-millions-americans-voting
Center for American Progress, “The SAVE America Act Explained.” https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-save-america-act-explained-how-the-new-show-your-papers-voting-bill-is-even-more-extreme-than-the-save-act/
On the series: This is Part 3 of The Fall. Part 1 laid out the analytical framework. Part 2 examined Portugal in 1974 and the Carnation Revolution. Part 4 will turn to the Philippines, 1986 — the original People Power revolution and the model that inspired every peaceful mass uprising since.
"Steven Levitsky, co-author of How Democracies Die, said this week that in some respects, Trump has already been more oppressive than Orbán ever was. That is worth sitting with."
Some of us are still being called alarmists.
The US is feeling the economic pain. Prices rising on goods, services, housing. Services disappearing. This was planned. Celebrate hope for a minute. We cannot ignore what is developing minutes away.
The media of Woodward and Bernstein no longer exists. My paper was purchased 20 yrs ago by a hedge fund and within weeks the opinion pages disappeared with talk of ads on page one. Neoliberalism is alive and well.
The infrastructure is in place to keep us from voting. Democrat messaging is weak, poor. Immigration enforcement is a disguise. The American public is being managed. As we say, "Yay, Orbán is gone," the regime sits in meetings. Detention Centers across the country are approved quickly and quietly. Going up faster than a convenience store. Make no mistake. The centers are not for immigrants. They are for you and me should we oppose this regime. Ice is the new Göring Gestapo. We must save ourselves or disappear. No rest.
Great analysis and if read carefully full of the warnings it should contain. Celebration here in the US should be over this Monday morning and back to work should be the trajectory. You hit every point that reveals the pitfalls of complacency. We have a state media now, a militia and elections that are being “managed” as we read. There’s much work ahead.